Legal Opinion

Columbus Bar Association v. Balaloski

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 2016No. 2015-1002PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

{If 1} Respondent, Daniel Karl Balaloski of Reynoldsburg, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0068122, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1997. On December 15, 2014, relator, Columbus Bar Association, charged Balaloski with professional misconduct arising out of six separate client matters. The charges against Balaloski included failing to provide competent representation, failing to act with reasonable diligence and promptness, failing to keep his clients reasonably informed about the status of their legal matters, failing to promptly deliver to a client funds the client was entitled…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. FolwellOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Toledo Bar Assn. v. StewartOhio Supreme Court · 2013

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dayton Bar Assn. v. Sullivan (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Columbus Bar Association v. Roseman.Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Mill Creek Metro. Dist. Bd. of Commrs. v. LessOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. McCray.Ohio Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API