Legal Opinion

Synnott v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 29, 1927No. A-6030PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Cleveland county on a charge of embezzlement, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the state penitenitary for 2V2 years.

The record discloses that defendant was appointed guardian for William Dixon, an incompetent, on November 26, 1920, and as such guardian received $1,330 of his ward’s money. He used these funds to purchase in his own name stock in the Norman Mercantile Company, of which company he was president, and in which he already owned a large part of the stock. This purchase of stock…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Weimer v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  2. State v. FulkersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Baschleben v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cummings v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Poole v. Terminix Co. Of Maryland and Washington, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  3. Jarrett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Glenn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
  5. Graham v. MiracleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API