Legal Opinion
Graham v. Miracle
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 3, 1976No. 50283PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRWIN, Justice:
Petitioner, Gar C. Graham, is defendant in the case of Richard A, Peterson v. Gar C. Graham, now pending in the District Court, Oklahoma County, Oklahoma. Peterson brought the action against Graham *606for alienation of affection and criminal conversation. Graham, as a witness called at trial by Peterson, refused to testify asserting a Fifth Amendment privilege based on potential criminal prosecution in the State of Minnesota. After proper proceedings, the trial court found petitioner in direct contempt and imposed punishment pursuant to 12 O.S.1971, § 394.
It is not asserted that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. BrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Synnott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
- State v. DlugiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
3Cited by4 opinions
- OKLAHOMA ASSOC. OF BROADCASTERS, INC. v. CITY OF NORMANSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Pierce v. PierceFairfax County Circuit Court · 1991
- OKLAHOMA ASSOC. OF BROADCASTERS, INC. v. CITY OF NORMANSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- OKLAHOMA ASSOC. OF BROADCASTERS, INC. v. CITY OF NORMANSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016