Legal Opinion
Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. Federal Power Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided November 21, 1957No. 13666PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WASHINGTON, Circuit Judge.
This case concerns the interpretation to be given the Supreme Court's decision in United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp., 1956, 350 U.S. 332, 76 S.Ct. 373, 100 L.Ed. 373. The chief question is whether the rule of that case applies where — as here — the controlling supply contracts pledge payment under designated rate schedules “or any effective superseding rate schedules.”
I
Petitioners seek review of an order of the Federal Power Commission denying their motions to reject new rate schedules filed by the intervenor United Gas Pipe Line Company (United).…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. Northwestern Public Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- City Of Pittsburgh v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- National Coal Ass'n v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- The Dayton Power and Light Company v. Federal Power Commission, Ohio Fuel Gas Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- City of Corinth, Mississippi v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Memphis Light, Gas And Water Division v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- United States v. BaltazarDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1979
- Nevada Natural Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.