Legal Opinion

Winston v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 16, 1949No. 32594PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) Counsel for the defendant contend, in ground 1 of their amended motion for a new trial, that the trial court erred in making an interpolation regarding the testimony of the State’s witness, that “He testified it was one and a half gallons,” on the ground that this amounted to an expression of what the evidence in the case showed.

A correct statement by the court as to the testimony of a witness is not error in the absence of special circumstances tending to show such an unwarranted emphasis upon certain testimony as might confuse or prejudice the jurors.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Calhoun v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  3. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  4. McIntyre v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  5. Lester v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Raif v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  2. Dugan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  3. Patterson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  4. Polite v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  5. Hunter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API