Legal Opinion

Raif v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 25, 1964No. 40186, 40187PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

1. These cases were tried under the law enunciated in Winston v. State, 79 Ga. App. 711 (2a) (54 SE2d 354), and the cases there cited which held: “Although evidence against a defendant in a criminal case may be obtained by peace officers in the course of an unlawful, unwarranted, unreasonable, and reprehensible search of the home of the defendant, in a flagrant violation of the Fourth Amendment of the Federal Constitution and article 1, section 1, paragraph 16 of the Constitution of the State of Georgia, this does not affect the admissibility of the evidence thus…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Radowick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  3. Peters v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  4. Blake v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  5. Kelly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API