Legal Opinion

Lester v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 10, 1923No. Nos. 3702, 3705PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

The original motions for a new trial consist of the general grounds that the verdicts are contrary- to daw,, contrary to evidence and without' evidence to support them, contrary to evidence and the principles of justice and equity.- The verdicts are supported 'by evidence, and the court did not err in overruling the motions based on these grounds;

The first ground of the amended motion of "Helen Lester is as follows: “ That on page nine, of the brief 'of the testimony, and in the first five lines thereof,' L. P. Higgins testified: There is a dining-table in the dining-room, and a china closet…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Calhoun v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  2. Shaw v. Jones, Newton & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  3. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  4. Duren v. City of ThomasvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hyde v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Dix v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  3. Herndon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  4. McIntyre v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  5. Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API