Legal Opinion
Franklin v. Mortgage Guaranty & Security Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 21, 1932No. 6612PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a decree of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Southern Division, wherein judgment was entered in favor of the appellee for $8,200, with interest and costs.
The appellant was president and director of the appellee company on the dates at which the transactions complained of took place. The lower court found that on June 20, 1922', at Yuma, Ariz., the appellant entered into a written agreement with Henry Sehumann-Heink, a duly authorized broker *835of San Diego, Cal., wherein Sehumann-Iieink was employed to sell…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Armstrong v. TolerSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
- Armstrong v. American Exchange Nat. Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Planters' Bank v. Union BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- McBlair v. GibbesSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Blum v. FleishhackerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1937
- Albert v. Black Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962
- Eastman Kodak Company, a Corporation v. John C. HendricksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- United States v. HendersonDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1939
- Hendricks v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1956