Legal Opinion

Pence v. Fox

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1991No. 90-483PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Weber

Plaintiffs brought this suit arising from personal injuries sustained by John R. Pence. The District Court for the Eighth Judicial District, Cascade County, granted defendants’ motions, pursuant to Rule 12(b), M.R.Civ.P., to dismiss loss of consortium claims of Brittney and Jared Pence, brought by their mother and guardian, Judy L. Pence. Mrs. Pence, as guardian for the children, appeals. We reverse and remand for further proceedings on the merits.

The issue as restated is: Do minor children have a separate cause of action for loss of parental consortium when a parent is tortiously injured by…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hay v. Medical Center Hosp. of VermontSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  2. Weitl v. MoesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  3. Wallace v. WallaceMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Hibpshman v. Prudhoe Bay Supply, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Bain v. GleasonMontana Supreme Court · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Mendillo v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Mountain West Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. BrewerMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Giuliani v. GuilerKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
  4. High v. HowardOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Hern v. Safeco Ins. Co. of IllinoisMontana Supreme Court · 2005

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API