Legal Opinion
City of Atlanta v. Padgett
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 3, 1942No. 29705PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
(after stating the foregoing facts.) The alleged errors of which complaint is made may be grouped into two divisions: first, the board acted in excess of authority and contrary to law; second, the evidence did not warrant the finding. We have set out in unusual detail the record in this case. We have made diligent search and have been unable to find where this court or any other court has passed upon a similar ease.
1. This contention arose under Code § 114-501, which reads as follows: “In case of a controversy arising between the employer and the employee relative to the continuance of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. SumrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- South v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. McFarleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Van Treeck v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Teems v. American Mutual Liability Ins.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Clark v. GEORGIA KRAFT COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- General Insurance Co. of America v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. BarfieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- City of Atlanta v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. BurchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.