Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Barfield

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 26, 1954No. 34952PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

Code § 114-503 provides in part as follows: “If the employee refuses to submit himself to or in any way obstructs such examination requested by and provided for by the employer, his right to compensation . . . shall be suspended.” Code (Ann. Supp.) § 114-501 provides in part: “The refusal of the employee to accept any medical, hospital, surgical or other treatment when ordered by the Industrial Board shall bar said employee from further compensation until such refusal ceases.” Refusal to submit to surgery will not bar the claimant from benefits under the act unless the surgery has been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bituminous Casualty Co. v. DyerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  2. City of Atlanta v. PadgettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  3. Zant v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1929

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Clark v. GEORGIA KRAFT COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  2. Bullington v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  3. Magnus Metal Division of National Lead Co. v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  4. Goswick v. Murray County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  5. Escobedo v. Agriculture Products Co., Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API