Legal Opinion

Cleland v. Eighth Judicial District Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1976No. 8817; No. 8829PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*455OPINION

2Per curiam

Consolidated for review, these cases concerning the recall of elected officials arise from district court orders 1) granting respondent’s petition for writ of mandamus, and 2) denying petitioners’ motion to intervene in proceedings concerning that petition.

Hearings to determine the sufficiency and validity of respondent’s petitions for recall were conducted pursuant to NRS 306.-040. Petitioners, Mayor and two Councilmen of the City of North Las Vegas, moved for and were denied intervention in those hearings. Thereafter, the district court issued a writ of mandamus directing appellant…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Petition for Removal of RiceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  2. State Ex Rel. Matzdorf v. ScottNevada Supreme Court · 1930
  3. In Re Marriage of GuinnColorado Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Springer v. MountNevada Supreme Court · 1970

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cirac v. Lander CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Nevadans for Nevada v. BeersNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Williams v. Clark County District AttorneyNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Strickland v. WaymireNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Las Vegas Convention & Visitors Authority v. MillerNevada Supreme Court · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API