Legal Opinion

Trolinger v. Boroughs.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 10, 1903PublishedCited by 10 opinions

ActxoN by D. M. Trolinger against J. P. Boroughs, heard by Judge W. B. Allen and a jury, at July Term, 1903, of the Superior Court of Nandolpi-i County. Erom a judgment for the defendant the plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtC'Onnor, J.

This action is prosecuted for the recovery of the penalty imposed by section 1816 of The Code, upon any Register of Deeds “who shall knowingly and without reasonable inquiry issue a license for the marriage of any two persons, to which there is any lawful impediment, or whether either of the persons is under the age of eighteen years, without the consent, etc.” The plaintiff testified that his daughter, for whose marriage the license complained of was issued, was at that time only a few months over thirteen years of age; that he did not give his consent thereto, did not see her married and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cole v. . LawsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Williams v. . HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  3. State ex rel. Joyner v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  4. Agent v. . WillisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  5. Harcum v. Marsh.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Furr v. Johnson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Gray v. . LentzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  3. Morrison v. Teague.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Joyner v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Julian v. . DanielsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API