Joyner v. Harris
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal from Biggs, J., at tbe January Term, 1911, of Cabar-■rus. > ! i Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion of tbe Court by Mr. Justice Walker.
1Opinion of the Court
"Walker, J.
Tbis is an action to recover tbe penalty given by Eevisal, sec. 2090, for unlawfully issuing a marriage license to Martin Burrus and Julia B. Joyner, without proper inquiry as to tbe age of tbe prospective bride. Tbe statute, under wbicb tbis suit was brought, is a wise and beneficent one, tbe object being to protect tbe parties themselves, and tbe community as well, from hasty and improvident matrimonial alliances, wbicb eventually produce discord and unhappiiness in the family — one. of tbe essential units of our republican household — and are hurtful to society in many ways..…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cole v. . LawsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Williams v. . HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- Bowles v. . CochranSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
- Furr v. Johnson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- State ex rel. Joyner v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gray v. . LentzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Snipes v. . WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920