Harcum v. Marsh.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
ActioN by Warren. Harcum against S. E. Harsh and others, heard by Judge F. D. Winston and a jury, at Eall Term, 1901, of the Superior Court of HeRtfobu Comity. From a judgment for the plaintiff, the defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.
This is an action by the father of the girl against the defendant Register of Deeds and his bondsmen upon his official bond, to recover the penalty of $200 imposed by virtue of Sec. 1816 of The Code. Defendant having objected for the first time in this Court that the action was brought in the name of Warren Harcum without having joined the State as a party plaintiff, plaintiff moved for leave to amend so as to make the State a party plaintiff, and to change the title of the action to that of the “State on the relation of Warren Harcum v. Marsh et al.,” which motion is allowed. Code, Sec. 965…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cole v. . LawsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Williams v. . HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- Grant v. . RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- State ex rel. Joyner v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
- Agent v. . WillisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Furr v. Johnson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Trolinger v. Boroughs.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Gray v. . LentzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Robertson v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Julian v. . DanielsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.