Legal Opinion

GUHNE v. CERIDIAN HCM, INC.

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided March 26, 2021No. 1:20-cv-00925Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA GENE GUHNE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 1:20-cv-925 ) CERIDIAN HCM, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, Chief District Judge. This case arises from the termination of Plaintiff Gene Guhne’s employment with Defendant Ceridian HCM, Inc. (“Ceridian”). Before the court is Ceridian’s motion for partial judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) or, in the alternative, to dismiss in part for forum non conveniens. (Doc. 15.) While Guhne alleges eight claims,…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API