Legal Opinion

Bess v. Ulmer

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1999No. S-8811/S-8812/S-8821PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Chief Justice.

1. INTRODUCTION

Citizen groups challenged three ballot propositions to amend the Alaska Constitution because the propositions were revisions not amendments; revisions can only be accomplished through a constitutional convention. In an expedited Preliminary Opinion and Order we held that Legislative Resolve No. 59 (relating to prisoners’ right’s) is a revision, and struck it from the ballot.1 Legislative Resolve No. 71 (limiting marriage) and Legislative Resolve No. 742 (relating to apportionment) are amendments, and therefore could appear on the ballot, though we…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Raven v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Legislature v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Brosnahan v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Strauss v. HortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Alaska Civil Liberties Union v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Citizens Protecting Michigan's Constitution v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Citizens Protecting Michigan's Constitution v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. State v. SchmidtAlaska Supreme Court · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API