Legal Opinion

Simms v. Buist

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 5, 1898PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Before WATTS, J., Barnwell, April, 1898. Action by Charles Carroll Simms v. H. E. Buist, for specific performance. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals. cites: 17 S. C., Burnett v. Burnett; 3 Rich. Eq., 559. cite: 1 Strob. Eq., 346; 3 Rich. Eq., 576; 16 S. C., 294; 23 S. C., 43; 42 S. C., 342; 2 S. C., 72.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chibe Justice MclvBR.

This was an action for the specific performance of a contract for the sale of land, and the only controversy between the parties is, as to whether the plaintiff is able to make a good and sufficient title to the land. The case was heard by his Honor, Judge Watts, upon an agreed statement of facts, a copy of which, together with a copy of the will of John Holly, through which plaintiff traces his title, is set out in the case. It seems that the land, which is the subject of the contract, was allotted to Mrs. E. A. Roundtree, a…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Adams v. VernerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
  2. Clark v. NevesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  3. First Carolinas Joint S.L. Bk. of Cola. v. FordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  4. Williams v. GauseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  5. Davenport v. EskewSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API