Legal Opinion

Borroel v. Lakeshore, Inc.

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided September 24, 1985No. 84-K-1707PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KANE, District Judge.

In this diversity action the Dick Corp. has moved for summary judgment on the claims presented in a third party complaint against it brought by Lake Shore, Inc. For the reasons below, summary judgment on the first claim for relief is denied. Summa ry judgment is granted on the second, third and fourth claims for relief.

BACKGROUND

Dick leased from Lake Shore a Terex Ts-24B loadrunner scraper. For purposes of the summary judgment motion, Dick admits there is an express agreement between it and Lake Shore which contains the following terms:

REPAIRS:

L…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Engelbrecht v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. Bell v. Koppers Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. City of Aurora, Colorado, and the City of Colorado Springs, Colorado v. Bechtel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  5. Henry Clayton Jones and Royal Globe Insurance Company v. Joy E. Nelson and Robert M. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Goodyear Tire v. J.M. Tull MetalsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Dutchmen Manufacturing, Inc. v. ReynoldsIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. United Cable Television of Jeffco, Inc. v. Montgomery LC, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Nelson v. McAdams, Roux and Associates, Inc.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1988
  5. Andrew Harbison v. JBS USA Food Company and Swift Pork CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2026

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API