Legal Opinion

In Re The Matter Of: Mark Jorstad v. Rita Jorstad

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 8, 2020No. 80041-8Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON In the Matter of: No. 80041-8-I Mark Jorstad, a vulnerable adult, DIVISION ONE Respondent, UNPUBLISHED OPINION v. Rita Jorstad, Appellant. LEACH, J. — On May 15, 2019, the trial court entered a five year Vulnerable Adult Protection Order (VAPO) on behalf of Mark Jorsted against his wife Rita Jorsted. 1 Rita appeals. She asserts the trial court should not have imposed the VAPO and violated Canons 2.2, 2.3, and 2.6 of the Washington Code of Judicial Conduct (CJC). The record contains substantial evidence that Rita abused and neglected Mark.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Jones v. Halvorson-BergCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  5. Sunnyside Valley Irr. Dist. v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API