Legal Opinion

Davies v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 19, 1978No. Docket 29555PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff brought a products liability action to recover for injuries sustained as the *349result of the failure of a tire manufactured by the defendant. The case was submitted to the jury on a theory of implied warranty. Plaintiff appeals from a verdict of no cause of action.

The only issue on appeal is whether uncontradicted testimony that the tire’s failure resulted from a manufacturing defect entitled the plaintiff to a jury instruction directing a finding that the tire was not reasonably fit for its anticipated use.

Defendant is a manufacturer of tires, one of which was sold to Great Lakes…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Piercefield v. Remington Arms Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Caldwell v. FoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Kupkowski v. Avis Ford, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Douglas v. Edgewater Park Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Druse v. WheelerMichigan Supreme Court · 1872

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Northwestern Equipment, Inc. v. CudmoreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Krzysiak v. HintonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Davies v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. McLaughlin v. Michelin Tire Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  5. McLaughlin v. Michelin Tire Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API