Davies v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiff brought a products liability action to recover for injuries sustained as the *349result of the failure of a tire manufactured by the defendant. The case was submitted to the jury on a theory of implied warranty. Plaintiff appeals from a verdict of no cause of action.
The only issue on appeal is whether uncontradicted testimony that the tire’s failure resulted from a manufacturing defect entitled the plaintiff to a jury instruction directing a finding that the tire was not reasonably fit for its anticipated use.
Defendant is a manufacturer of tires, one of which was sold to Great Lakes…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Piercefield v. Remington Arms Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Caldwell v. FoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Kupkowski v. Avis Ford, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Douglas v. Edgewater Park Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1963
- Druse v. WheelerMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Northwestern Equipment, Inc. v. CudmoreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Krzysiak v. HintonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Davies v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- McLaughlin v. Michelin Tire Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- McLaughlin v. Michelin Tire Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989