McLaughlin v. Michelin Tire Corp.
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
URBIGKIT, Justice,
specially concurring and dissenting.
I. STATUS OF CASE ON APPEAL
Following adverse summary judgment on a scraper driver’s lawsuit claiming serious physical injuries caused by improperly performing equipment tires, this court considers his dismissed claims asserting liability for:
1. negligent manufacture and design of the tire by the manufacturer (Michelin);1
*702(a). strict liability for injury producing performance of a faulty product (Michelin);
2(b). strict liability for injury producing performance of a faulty product (dealer/supplier Cobre Tire);
3(a). express warranty of the…
2Cases cited131 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.