In Re Lorillard Tobacco Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
*983McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:
This case arises from the district court’s denial of Lorillard Tobacco Company’s application for an ex parte order to seize purportedly counterfeit cigarettes. Upon Lorillard’s timely appeal, we find ourselves confronted with a novel issue of appellate jurisdiction. To date, only one court has faced the question whether a seizure order authorized under the trademark law, 15 U.S.C. § 1116(d), is an injunction, and whether an interlocutory order denying seizure is thus appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). See Vuitton v. White, 945 F.2d 569, 572 (3d Cir.1991) (holding…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Carson v. American Brands, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Switzerland Cheese Assn., Inc. v. E. Horne's Market, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State of Alabama v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Sierra Forest Legacy v. ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Apple Inc. v. Psystar Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2009
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.