Taylor v. Savage
Supreme Court of the United States
moved the court for leave tó give an .appeal bond in this case, which shall operate as a supersedeas, and for leave to docket the cross-appeal, and for such relief as may meet the case.
Read the full summary
moved the court for leave tó give an .appeal bond in this case, which shall operate as a supersedeas, and for leave to docket the cross-appeal, and for such relief as may meet the case. He stated that Taylor had obtainéd a decree against Savage, executor of Savage, in the court below, for $5000 and upwards; that the decree was actually rendered on the 29th day of November, 1842, but was entered' as of the' day before; that the complainant had appealed from this decree, and sent the record up to this court, where the case is now pending;. that an appeal was also prayed and allowed on the part…
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taney
This case is brought before the court- by the petition of Vincent M. Benham, administrator de bonis non with the will annexed of Samuel Savage.
It appears that a bill, was filed by William Taylor and others,, in the District Court of. the United States for the northern district of.Alabama, against George M. Savage, executor of Samuel Savage, deceased, to which the defendant appeared and answered. ■Testimony was taken on both sides, and at the final hearing on the 28th of November, 1842, the court decreed that the complainants recover óf the respondent, as executor of Samuel Savage, $5212 92…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Miller v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Davis v. PrestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- National Bank of Troy v. StantonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Simon v. SimonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Miller v. Neff'sWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.