Legal Opinion

Carmack v. Nichols

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1944PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The determinative question presented on this appeal from a decree of the Chancellor, is whether or not appellant Carmack, a judgment creditor of Claude Nichols, one of the parties, may subject to the satisfaction of his judgment by (1) levy of execution, or (2) bill of discovery under the statute money taken from the person of Nichols, while a prisoner under arrest by police officers, when the money was not connected with the crime for which he had been arrested.

It must be conceded, as found by the Chancellor, that the point has been directly decided by this Court adversely to appellant…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jourolmon v. MassengillTennessee Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Green v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Dahms v. SearsOregon Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Commercial Exchange Bank v. McLeodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  5. North v. PuckettTennessee Supreme Court · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Keep Fresh Filters, Inc. v. ReguliCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
  2. Brashears v. HartsookTennessee Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API