Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Employment Security Department
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided November 7, 2006No. 33284-1-IIPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
¶1 Carl A. Anderson appeals the Employment Security Department’s (Department) denial of unemployment compensation benefits to him based on work-related misconduct. Anderson argues that the Department’s findings of fact do not support a conclusion that he willfully disregarded his employer’s interest or that his misconduct harmed his employer. Because substantial evidence supports the Department’s decision that Anderson intentionally and willfully disregarded his employer’s interest, which created a conflict of interest that harmed his employer, we affirm.
FACTS
¶2 King County (County) employed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tapper v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Everett Concrete Products, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Hamel v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- Superior Asphalt & Concrete Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Superior Asphalt & Concrete Co. v. L&ICourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Smith v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Smith v. EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPT.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Daniels v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Thomas v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Gibson v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.