Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Employment Security Department
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 5, 2013No. 69252-6-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLau, J.
¶1 John Thomas appeals from a Washington Employment Security Department commissioner’s decision denying his request for unemployment benefits. The commissioner applied RCW 50.44.050 and determined that Thomas, an elementary school lunchroom manager, was ineligible for benefits because he was a school employee who sought benefits during a summer school break period, despite having a reasonable assurance of returning to work at the beginning of the next academic year. Because the commissioner correctly applied the law to the unchallenged factual findings, we affirm.
FACTS
¶2 The facts are…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Tapper v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Safeco Insurance v. MeyeringWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Verizon Northwest, Inc. v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Verizon Northwest, Inc. v. Wash. Emp. SEC. Dept.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Vancouver v. Public Employment Relations CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Stericycle of Washington, Inc. v. Washington Utilities & Transportation CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- United Educators of San Francisco AFT/CFT v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Stericycle Of Wa, Inc. v. Wa Utilities & Transportation Commission,respondentsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Thomas v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013