Legal Opinion

Stapleton v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1947PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarlow, J.

This is a workmen’s compensation case, in which plaintiff-respondent, Francis Stapleton, denies he is subject to the act. Stapleton owned and operated a cheese factory at Dodgeville, Wisconsin, which he operated without help except the occasional assistance of his fourteen-year-old son when he was not in school. There were living rooms in the cheese-factory building, which were occupied by Stapleton and his family. In the winter of 1940-1941, Stapleton purchased some standing timber, which was cut into polewood, and in January, 1941, he engaged Paul Linderman, who owned a saw rig, and four…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pabst Corp. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Guse v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Kelley v. HaylockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lloyd Frank Logging v. HealyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
  2. Noyce v. Aggressive Metals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API