Legal Opinion

State v. Kranendonk

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1932No. 5196PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WORTHEN, District Judge.

The defendant was prosecuted for bastardy, and after a trial by jury was found guilty of being the father of a child born of Hazel Swenson, as alleged in the information. The proceedings had during the trial, including the court’s rulings on the evidence offered and the court’s instructions to the jury, are not included in the bill of exceptions.

Before sentence was pronounced the defendant filed his motion in arrest of judgment and also filed a motion for a new trial, which motions were by the court denied, and the court pronounced judgment against the defendant,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. ReeseUtah Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Perrin v. Union Pac. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1921
  3. State v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1924
  4. State v. McKnightUtah Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BartholomewUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Dalton v. StoutUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Hemby v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  4. Lopez v. MaesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
  5. State v. BurrisUtah Supreme Court · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API