Legal Opinion
State v. Anderson
Utah Supreme Court
Decided March 7, 1924No. 4092PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGideon, J.
The appellant was proceeded against under the Bastardy Act, Comp. Laws Utah 1917, title 9.
The complaining witness was one Cora Ray. By the verdict of the jury appellant was found “guilty of being the father of the child of Cora Ray as alleged in the information.”
*173Subsequent to the entry of judgment upon the verdict, appellant filed a motion for new trial. The motion was denied on July 9, 1923. The notice of appeal was served and filed on November 23, 1923. The respondent, the state of Utah by the district attorney, has moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the proceeding is criminal…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. ReeseUtah Supreme Court · 1913
- Flores v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1916
3Cited by13 opinions
- BORLAND BY DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERV. v. ChandlerUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- Dorsey v. EnglishCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Bishop v. WebsterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
- State v. JuddUtah Supreme Court · 1972
- Lohsen v. LawsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.