Legal Opinion

Holmes v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 22, 2002No. WD 60878PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Judge.

Douglas Holmes appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his post-conviction motion under Rule 29.15. The underlying facts are as follows: The State charged Holmes with three counts of robbery in the first degree, § 569.020, 1 and three counts of armed criminal action, § 571.015. Holmes waived his right to a jury trial. After the State presented its case, Holmes’ attorney requested, and was granted, a brief recess to consult with his client. During the recess, Holmes pocketed the money he was alleged to have stolen from his victims, which had been…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. State v. TroupeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  4. Suhre v. Haywood CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  5. State v. CarterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pradt v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. State v. OreMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. State v. MasseyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Smith v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. State v. BooneMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API