State ex rel. Humphrey v. Heckler
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LAY, Chief Judge.
This petition for review is brought by the State of Minnesota, challenging the Secretary’s disapproval of the State’s proposed modification to its standard of need and level of benefits affecting recipients with earned income under its administration of the Aid to Families with Dependent Children Program (AFDC). In 1981 Congress *371passed the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA), amending the treatment accorded earned income under the AFDC program. Pub.L. No. 97-35, 95 Stat. 357, 843 (1981), amending 42 U.S.C. §§ 602-676. The Minnesota legislature incorporated these…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Jefferson v. HackneySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State of Minnesota v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984