Holliday v. Thomas
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Hancock Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Morris, C.
— The appellees sued the appellants for the' purpose of having a certain judgment declared satisfied. The-complaint consists of two paragraphs.
The first states that "William J. Holliday, John W. Murphy and John A. Furgason, on the 16th day of March, 1875, recovered a judgment in the Hancock Circuit Court against-the appellees, William O. Thomas and Austin K. Spencer, for' the sum of $198.44 and costs amounting to $9.95; that on or about the 13th day of March, 1876, the appellees fully paid off said judgment and costs, and that the appellants thereupon promised and agreed to satisfy…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fort Wayne, Jackson & Saginaw R. R. v. HusselmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Miller v. EdmonstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
- Jones v. RansomIndiana Supreme Court · 1852
- Russell v. DrummondIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
- Corning v. StrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1849
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Crawfordsville Trust Co. v. RamseyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
- Ginn v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Stumph v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. State ex rel. GaryIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
- Newman v. KiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.