Legal Opinion

Corning v. Strong

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1849PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ERROR to the Cass Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, J. —

This suit was commenced by a bill of inter-pleader. The bill alleges that Strong and Miller, co-partners at Logansport, Indiana, on the 3d of September, 1840, bought of Corning and Horner, co-partners at Albany, New York, a bill of goods amounting to 428 dollars and 37 cents on a credit of six months; they gave no note, but the foregoing amount was charged against them on *330the books of Corning and Co.; that, on the 30th of May, 1842, Corning and Co., gave to one Robt. E. Ward, their agent, a written order, directing the complainants to pay said amount to said Ward; that, on the 24th…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Miller v. EdmonstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1846

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Holliday v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Hamilton National Bank v. NyeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. O'Conner v. ArnoldIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Palmer v. EgbertIndiana Supreme Court · 1853

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API