Legal Opinion
Andrews v. Connecticut Properties, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 1, 1950PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
Alessandro Gagliardini, a subsequent attaching creditor, claims that the plaintiff’s mortgage is invalid as to him because it does not describe the debt secured by it with sufficient accuracy. He claims that the facts found do not support the conclusions reached.
In 1947, Mary Smith and Connecticut Properties, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the defendants, agreed to purchase a tract of land in Greenwich from the trustees of the estate of Frank C. Poucher, hereinafter referred to as the trustees, for $40,000. At the closing on May 14, 1948, the defendants lacked $3492.86 of the amount…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- North v. BeldenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1840
- Rowan v. Sharps' Rifle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1865
- First National Bank v. National Grain CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Ives v. StoneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1884
- Matz v. ArickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- MacHiz v. Homer Harmon, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Sadd v. HeimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Maloney v. American National Bank (In re Terkeltaub)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1990
- In the Matter of American Metal Products Co., Inc., Bankrupt. Arthur B. Weiss, Trustee-Appellant, Walter E. Heller Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Kirk v. MacDonaldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.