Legal Opinion

Wall v. County of St. Louis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 28, 1908No. Nos. 15,788-(244)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Action in the district court for St. Louis county to enjoin that county and certain of its officers from issuing and disposing of bonds to the amount of $600,000 for the construction of a court house. From m order, Cant, J., sustaining defendants’ demurrer to the complaint, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

¡LLIOTT, J.

This is an appeal from an order sustaining a general demurrer to le complaint in an action to enjoin the county of St. Louis and its fficials from issuing bonds under the authority of chapter 130, p. ■43, Laws 1907, for the construction of the county courthouse.

*404The question presented is the constitutionality of the statute; the appellant contending that it is special legislation, and the respondent that it is a general law based upon a proper classification of counties.

The facts which the respondent claims authorize the issue of the bonds are very fully stated in the complaint. It…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Board of Courthouse & City Hall Com'rs v. CooleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. State ex rel. Board of Education v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Hunter v. City of TracySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  4. Hetland v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  5. Dallas County v. McKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Visina v. FreemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. Driscoll v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  4. Board of Education v. BorgenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  5. Roe v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API