Legal Opinion

Clinton v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1900No. 9,270PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before Hall, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, C. J.

William M. Clinton brought this action in the district court of Lancaster county for benefits which he claimed to be due him as a member of the Burlington Voluntary Belief Department for injuries received by him in the year 1890, while an employee of defendant. By the terms of his certificate of membership in said association or department, he was entitled, under stipulated conditions, to certain sums of money during the continuance of his disability, and to certain other sums which it is not necessary to set forth at length, the certificate being identical in its terms with that litigated in…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. BeazleySupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  2. King v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HealyNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. OlsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Koeller v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API