Legal Opinion
Concrete Steel Co. v. Rowles Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided June 2, 1917No. 19557PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from the district court for Webster county: Harry S. Dungan, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtSedgwick, J.
The defendant, Rowles Company, was a general contractor with the county of Webster for the construction of a court house, and gave the bond in suit, with the National Surety Company as surety. This plaintiff, at the request-of Julian S. Nolan Company, furnished material used in the construction of the building*. The plaintiff brought this action in the district court for Webster county against the Rowles Company, the original contractor, and the National Surety Company as surety for said contractor. There was no service upon the Rowles Company, and the *401action proceeded against the surety…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Hill v. American Surety Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Mankin v. United States Ex Rel. Ludowici-Celadon Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Hardaway v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Caulfield v. PolkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
- Rudolph Hegener Co. v. FrostIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Indiana Limestone Co. v. CuthbertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
- Vulcraft v. Midtown Business Park, Ltd.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- McElhose v. Universal Surety Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1968