Legal Opinion
Carnegie Mellon University v. Marvell Technology Group, Ltd.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 23, 2013No. Civil Action No. 09-290PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORA BARRY FISCHER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is a patent infringement case brought by Plaintiff, Carnegie Mellon University (“CMU”), against Defendants Marvell Technology Group, Ltd. and Marvell *582Semiconductor, Inc. (collectively “Marvell”), alleging that Marvell has infringed two of its patents, U.S. Patent Nos. 6,201,-839 (the “'839 Patent”) and 6,438,180 (the “'180 Patent”) (collectively, the “CMU Patents”). CMU contends that Marvell’s infringement was willful. (Docket No. 461). Marvell counters that the CMU Patents are invalid. (Docket No. 465). This matter was tried…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Carnegie Mellon University v. Marvell Technology Group, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- France Telecom S.A. v. Marvell Semiconductor Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- BERNARD v. BNY MELLON, NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- Carnegie Mellon University v. LSI Corporation, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026