Legal Opinion

State v. Garza

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1994No. 60724-9PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndersen, C.J.

Facts of Case

The Defendant, who pleaded guilty to the crime of first degree rape, challenges his exceptional sentence; his pres ent claim is that the trial court’s findings in support of the sentence are not supported by the record. We affirm.

The presentence investigation report and the transcribed statement of a participant in the crime 1 show that on the afternoon of August 7,1991, Defendant Leonicio (Leo) Garza, his sister Gloria Garza, Leo’s nephew and Gloria’s son Robert Eriksson, along with another young woman, drove to the home of the female victim in order to "scare” or "take care of’…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. MailWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. AllertWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. HandleyWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. NguyenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. BranchWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. SweetWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. CannonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. CannonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. PhelpsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API