Legal Opinion

State v. Sweet

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1999No. 67136-2, 67377-2PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

980 P.2d 1223 (1999)

138 Wash.2d 466

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Isaac Donald SWEET, Petitioner.

State of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Robert James Slaton, Petitioner.

Nos. 67136-2, 67377-2.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued June 8, 1999.

Decided July 15, 1999.

Clayton Dickinson, Fircrest, for Petitioners.

John Ladenburg, Pierce County Prosecutor, Barbara Corey-Boulet, Deputy, Tacoma, for Respondent.

SMITH, J.

Petitioners Isaac Donald Sweet and Robert James Slaton seek review of decisions of the Court of Appeals, Division II, which affirmed decisions of the Pierce County Superior Court…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Doe v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. State v. EasterWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. EasterWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. VladovicWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. MichielliWashington Supreme Court · 1997

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. CroninWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. GoreWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Enterprise Leasing, Inc. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1999

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API