People v. Pichcuskie
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from an order of the Niagara County Court (Sara S. Farkas, J.), dated July 13, 2012. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an oral decision determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ([SORA] Correction Law § 168 et seq.). In the exercise of our discretion, we deem the appeal as properly taken from the order that was subsequently entered (see CPLR 5520…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. MingoNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. BowlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. WindhamNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- WITHERSPOON, DAVID A., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016