Legal Opinion
King v. United States ex rel. Tiedtke
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 24, 1939No. 8849PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
Appellees are holders of a judgment against Hardee County, Florida, on bonds issued by it, for $10,740.50, and against Flardee County on behalf of Special Road and Bridge District No. 7, on bonds issued by the District, for $24,676.66. As such holders they sued appellants for and obtained a final judgment and order for peremptory writ of mandamus, directing the levy and collection in and for the year 1938 of a millage tax, sufficient, if collected, to pay their judgments. They did not, however, obtain this except over appellants’ vigorous protest and complaint, that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Greathouse v. DernSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- East St. Louis v. AmySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- City of Cleveland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
- State Ex Rel. Sterling Bottome v. City of St. PetersburgSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- City of Asbury Park, N. J. v. ChristmasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Associated Indemnity Corporation v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
- Garcia v. City of South TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- North Miami v. MeredithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- Pillow v. Board of CommissionersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985