Legal Opinion
David J. RENNER and Darcy L. Renner, His Wife, Appellants, v. LANARD TOYS LIMITED
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 25, 1994No. 94-3009PublishedCited by 89 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SLOVITER, Chief Judge.
Appellants David J. Renner and his wife, Darcy L. Renner, appeal from the district court’s order dismissing for lack of personal jurisdiction their products liability case against the defendant, Lanard Toys, Ltd. This case calls upon us to consider the current status of the “stream of commerce” theory of establishing specific jurisdiction over a defendant, a theory we have not addressed since our opinion in Max Daetwyler Corp. v. Meyer, 762 F.2d 290 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 980, 106 S.Ct. 383, 88 L.Ed.2d 336 (1985). Since then, the Supreme…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Mellon Bank (East) Psfs, National Association v. Kenneth v. Farino Leslie Trinin Robert Levitas Eileen MichaelsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- D'Jamoos, Estate of Weingeroff v. Pilatus AircraftCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Spir Star AG v. KimichTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- Julio E. Roman v. John AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Kuenzle v. HTM Sport-Und Freizeitgeräte AGCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Pennzoil Products Company v. Colelli & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.