Legal Opinion
Kuenzle v. HTM Sport-Und Freizeitgeräte AG
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 11, 1996No. 95-8031PublishedCited by 154 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Chief Judge.
Defendant HTM SporL-Und Freizeitgeráte AG (Tyrolia) sought leave to appeal the district court’s denial of its motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The district court granted leave for a permissive appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). We accepted the appeal and we now reverse the decision of the district court.
I
Plaintiff Beverly Kuenzle, a tourist from Missouri, was seriously injured in a skiing accident near Jackson, Wyoming, in 1990. At the time of the accident, Ms. Kuenzle was using Model 285-S ski bindings that were manufactured in Austria by…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by154 opinions
- Dudnikov v. Chalk & Vermilion Fine Arts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Omi Holdings, Inc. v. Royal Insurance Company Of CanadaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Bartile Roofs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- D'Jamoos, Estate of Weingeroff v. Pilatus AircraftCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Spir Star AG v. KimichTexas Supreme Court · 2010
149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.