Legal Opinion

Ardmore State Bank v. Lee

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 11, 1916No. 6668PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from County Court; Carter County ; W. P. Freeman, Judge. Action by Albert J. Lee against the Ard-more State Bank. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

MATHEWS. C.

The parties will be designated as in the trial court. This was an action to recover usury paid defendant for a loan, evidenced by a note. On the 18th day of June, 1909, the defendant loaned the plaintiff the sum of $50u upon a note due in 90 days, bearing interest at the rate of 10 per cent, per annum after maturity. This note shows the following notations on its back:

“Jan. 11th, 1910, Int. paid to 2 — 1—10.

June 22nd, 1910, Int. paia to 7 — 1—10.

July 20, 1910, Int. paid to 8 — 1—10.

1 — 7 Int. paid to 3 — 1, 1911.”

The note was paid on the 30th d ■ - * January, 1911. On the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brown v. Marion National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Skelly v. Bristol Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  3. Lynch v. Merchants National Bank of West VirginiaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Hubbard v. OgdenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  5. English v. LandonIllinois Supreme Court · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bean v. RumrillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Simmons v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Citizens' State Bank of Ft. Gibson v. StrahanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Burrill v. Robert Marsh & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Kenney v. EblenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API