Legal Opinion

Hines v. Partridge

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1920PublishedCited by 46 opinions

PROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Hamilton County. — - Hon. Oscar Yarnell, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Halt

This is an action of damages brought by H. W. Partridge, who will hereinafter be referred to as the plaintiff, against W. D. Hines, Director General of Railroads, who will hereinafter be referred to as the defendant, to recover for the alleged wrongful and negligent killing of his wife, Mrs. Dove Partridge on February 21, 1919, in the city of Chattanooga, Tenn., in a collision between the plaintiff’s automobile and one of the trains controlled and operated by the defendant, at Market street in said city.

A trial of the case in the court below before the court and jury resulted in verdict and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gratiot v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  2. Tennessee Central Railroad v. MorganTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. Brunswick & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  4. Norman v. Southern Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. WebbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Osborn v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Provident Life & Accident Ins. v. PrietoTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Phillips v. Newport Et Ux.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1945
  4. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. WhiteTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Phillips-Buttorff Manufacturing Co. v. McAlexanderCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1932

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API