Legal Opinion

Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. Brunswick & Western Railroad

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 13, 1891PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Railroads. Negligence. Actions. Notice. Munich pal corporations. Before Judge Bower. Dougherty superior court. April term, 1890. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Simmons, Justice.

1. The Central Railroad & Banking Company brought an action against the Brunswick & Western Railroad Company, alleging that an engine belonging to plaintiff had been damaged to the amount of one thousand' dollars, and its engineer, Scoville, had been seriously injured, by a collision between said engine and a train of defendant, which resulted from the negligence of the latter. The declaration set forth in detail the injuries alleged to have been sustained by the engineer. It also alleged that plaintiff had paid out large sums of money, specifying the amounts, for expenses…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Crowley v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  2. Gardner v. AdamsNew York Supreme Court · 1834
  3. Marshall v. MeansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  4. Knobloch v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  5. Whitson v. City of FranklinIndiana Supreme Court · 1870

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Street Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  2. Sullivan v. CurlingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  3. Underwood v. Atlanta & West Point RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  4. Hines v. PartridgeTennessee Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Allen v. Macon, Dublin & Savannah R. R.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API