Legal Opinion

Household Fuel Corp. v. Hamacher

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 27, 1954PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

This is an action of contract to recover for fuel allegedly furnished by the plaintiff to the defendants. Originally there were three defendants, Hamacher, Hoskins, and Fine, but it appeared at the trial that Hoskins had died prior to the commencement of the action and upon motion of the plaintiff he was eliminated as a party. A verdict was directed in favor of the defendant Hamacher, and the jury returned a verdict against the defendant Fine, who brings the case here on exceptions and will hereinafter be referred to as the defendant.

One Crowe, a witness called by the plaintiff, testified…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Weiner v. D. A. Schulte, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. Graustein v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  3. Fanciullo v. B. G. & S. Theatre Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  4. Loring v. MercierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  5. Stemmler v. . Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1904

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TrappMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  2. Sevigny v. City of BiddefordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. ArsenaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  4. First National Bank of Cape Cod v. North Adams Hoosac Savings BankMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  5. Brockton Hospital v. CooperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API