Legal Opinion

Diesen v. Hessburg

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 28, 1989No. C2-88-1345PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) granted to respondents John Hessburg and the Duluth News-Tribune in a libel action. The jury had found by special verdict that an article published by respondents was defamatory to appellant Donald Diesen, that the implication of the article was substantially false, that Diesen demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that respondent published the article with reckless disregard as to the truth of the implication of the article, and that Diesen had proved by clear and convincing evidence that the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Garrison v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. HeppsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Diesen v. HessburgSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Foley v. WCCO Television, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Diesen v. HessburgSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Diesen v. HessburgSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Foley v. WCCO Television, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API